31 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
31 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
This workflow analyses Oxford Nanopore long-read RNA sequencing data. It uses
|
|
[`bambu`](https://bioconductor.org/packages/bambu/) to build and quantify
|
|
transcript models, can optionally run
|
|
[`SQANTI3`](https://github.com/ConesaLab/SQANTI3) for transcript classification
|
|
and QC, and can optionally run
|
|
[`DESeq2`](https://bioconductor.org/packages/DESeq2/) and
|
|
[`DEXSeq`](https://bioconductor.org/packages/DEXSeq/) for differential
|
|
analysis.
|
|
|
|
The workflow supports:
|
|
|
|
+ transcript identification from either cDNA or direct RNA reads
|
|
+ optional cDNA preprocessing with `pychopper` before alignment
|
|
+ transcript discovery guided by a supplied genome and annotation
|
|
+ quantification against a supplied reference annotation
|
|
+ optional transcript classification and QC with `SQANTI3`
|
|
+ differential gene expression with `DESeq2`
|
|
+ differential transcript usage with `DEXSeq`
|
|
|
|
The main transcriptome result is a shared `bambu` model built from all samples
|
|
together. The workflow also produces separate per-sample transcriptomes, so
|
|
each sample has its own GTF, FASTA, count tables, and optional `SQANTI3`
|
|
summary alongside the shared results.
|
|
|
|
For users familiar with earlier transcriptome workflows, the main change is
|
|
that transcript discovery, quantification, and optional differential analysis
|
|
now use the shared `bambu` outputs rather than the older
|
|
StringTie/GffCompare/Salmon-based approach. The rest of this README explains
|
|
the current workflow in plain terms, while the `FAQ` and `Troubleshooting`
|
|
sections call out the main differences from the previous workflow version.
|