wf-transcriptomes-v202/docs/10_troubleshooting.md

• Check that the reference genome and reference annotation use overlapping sequence names. The workflow checks this early and will fail if there is no overlap at all.
• If --de_analysis is enabled, ensure the sample sheet contains alias, the primary condition column, and any columns named in --covariates.
• DE/DTU requires at least two condition levels and at least two samples per level.
• See how to interpret common Nextflow exit codes here.

Common confusion when coming from the previous workflow version

I supplied --ref_transcriptome, but the workflow still built or used bambu outputs

The previous workflow version used --ref_transcriptome as a main driver for transcript-level downstream analysis. In the current version the --ref_transcriptome option has been removed and is not part of the current bambu input setup.

Use --transcriptome_mode fixed_annotation together with --ref_genome and --ref_annotation if you want annotation-driven quantification without transcript discovery.

I omitted --ref_annotation because I expected the old input setup

The previous workflow version could be driven from a different combination of transcriptome inputs. In the current version both --ref_genome and --ref_annotation are required in discover and fixed_annotation modes. Always provide a compatible genome FASTA and transcript annotation when launching the workflow.

I used --transcriptome_source and got behaviour I did not expect

In the previous workflow version the --transcriptome_source was the main setting that chose how the workflow behaved. In the current version, --transcriptome_mode is the main setting that controls this. The --transcriptome_source option has been removed from the workflow interface.

The options --transcriptome_mode discover or --transcriptome_mode fixed_annotation should be used to choose between the modes of operation.

I cannot find the old flat DE output files

In the previous workflow version, DE files appeared directly under de_analysis/. In the current version DE and DTU results are grouped by contrast under de_analysis/<contrast>/. Look for outputs such as de_analysis/<contrast>/results_dge.tsv and de_analysis/<contrast>/results_dtu_transcript.tsv.

I expected the old output layout or transcriptome files

The previous workflow version emitted one flat set of transcriptome. In the current versions, the output folder is organised around cohort/, samples/<alias>/, de_analysis/<contrast>/, and igv_reference/.

Primary shared transcriptome results are under cohort/, and samples/<alias>/ for sample-specific models.

My DE/DTU run fails because of --sample_sheet

The sample sheet rules have been amended compared to the previous version to allow for multi-way comparisons.

The sample sheet must contain alias, the primary condition column, and any columns named in --covariates. At least two condition levels are required, and each level must contain at least two samples.

What to change: verify the sample sheet columns first, then check --condition_column, --covariates, and --reference_level.

I hit genome/annotation validation or strand-related annotation warnings

The workflow validates that the annotation and genome share sequence names, and it excludes unstranded annotation entries from the differential analysis path.

Confirm the genome and annotation come from a compatible source, and ensure the annotation uses only + or - strand values where required for DE/DTU and SQANTI3.